Your legacy systems get analyzed, documented, and modernized with AI-assisted methods — while operations of the old systems continue uninterrupted during migration. One partner, one plan, no double team. AI Operating System path when legacy systems block AI adoption.
A modernized stack is the artefact. A live workflow on top of it is the proof.
Event-sourced, model-agnostic, EU-resident. Replayable. Instrumented for AI consumption.
The 6-component model rebuilt into operating primitives. Composable. Audit-traced.
DSGVO + sectoral. DPIA, model registry, rollback ≤24h, supervisory-ready.
Production by month 06, on the new stack — same delivery commitment as the Accelerator.
Your ops team's pane of glass. Shadow-mode, switch, rollback — without engineering.
The 60–80% defensible. CFO sign-off. Tied to instrumentation in the new stack.
No 9-month replatform that lands in one cutover. Each slice runs in shadow against the old stack first.
Workflow + stack audit. Methodology applied. Slice plan locked.
Data + workflow planes for one workflow. Shadow mode against legacy.
Switch traffic. Legacy retires. Cost-out starts compounding.
Slices 02–04 land on the same plane. Each is faster + cheaper than the last.
Most Modernization engagements surface during Plan 2 or Plan 3 of the unified path — when legacy systems block AI adoption. It runs in parallel with the build, or as a follow-on after the OS is live.
● Not sure which plan you're on? Take the 10-min Diagnostic → ● Already on the path? See the AI Operating System page →
Most engagements start with the Audit — a clear recommendation, migration plan, and cost frame in 2–3 weeks. Stabilization keeps the legacy running while the AI-native rebuild begins.
Replatforms fail because they ship at the end. This ships every slice.
Every slice runs in shadow against the legacy system before traffic switches. Cutovers are anti-climactic on purpose.
The data + workflow planes are written so swapping models or providers is a config change, not a project.
BaFin, FINMA, sectoral regulators — your filing pack is a deliverable, not an afterthought. Supervisory language built in.
If after M06 you don't want slices 02–04, you walk with a working stack and a live workflow. No vendor handcuffs.
No 9-month replatform. The slice plan means your production cutover happens in month 06 — on a narrow workflow — and the rest compounds on a stack that's already live.
Then they should. Our pod can run alongside as senior reviewers and pair-ship instead of leading. Pricing flexes downward; KPIs and guarantees don't.
No. Proven across AWS, Azure, GCP, Hetzner, OVH, on-prem, and air-gapped environments. The data + workflow planes are built so provider swaps are a configuration change, not a project.
Yes — that's a common pattern. Several engagements have replaced 7-figure annual SaaS / managed-service contracts with the new stack. The cost-out memo accounts for it.
The governance plane is the deliverable here. You get a bundled DPIA, model registry, audit log spec, pen-test scope, and supervisory filing kit. Your auditors get a single binder.
If you're already in Plan 2 or Plan 3, the Audit slot is reserved. If you're approaching Modernization standalone, the Diagnostic tells you whether it's the right next move.
AutoGen, LangGraph, CrewAI, and the Claude Agent SDK each have strengths. But orchestration design, memory architecture, governance layers, model routing, and observability determine whether your multi-agent system creates value — not the framework you pick.
May 29, 2026A practitioner assessment of Microsoft Copilot Studio's multi-agent capabilities in 2026 — built-in RAG, orchestration patterns, licensing realities, and the architectural ceiling that determines whether it's enough for your enterprise.
May 28, 2026Traditional migration logic says delay costs more. AI-assisted migration changes the economics. Here's a decision framework for DACH enterprises choosing between migrating now or creating value first.
May 19, 2026LLM hallucination rates by domain, the real business risk at scale, and the mitigation architectures that reduce enterprise exposure.
May 18, 2026AI tools can now automate significant portions of legacy migration work. But the productivity gains are uneven, and enterprise migration risk remains. Here's what the data shows.
May 14, 2026Deloitte's 2026 State of AI survey finds only 25% of enterprises have moved 40%+ of AI projects into production. The barriers aren't technological — they're organizational.
May 11, 2026